Sunday, July 24, 2022

TD Festival of South Asia, 2022

 The TD Festival of South Asia is a free street festival in Gerrard India Bazaar celebrating South Asian (OK mostly Indian) culture, food, entertainment and heritage.


They close off Gerrard street for the Indian section, and even the streetcars are rerouted. It is more or less an excuse for many of the businesses here to display their wares in the street. Gerrard street (the India Bazaar section) was known back in the day (late 90s, early 2000s) as the South Asian place in Toronto. That distinction, of course, has been lost over the decades as the South Asian diaspora spread far and wide, and now no one really needs to go Gerrard any more for their desi stuff.


The food choices were many. There were multiple stalls selling appetizers such as samosas or cane juice or mango lassi, as well as regulars such as chaat, bhelpuri and so on. The line ups weren't that long in the afternoon, and the prices reasonable.


The eastern section of the plaza contained more diverse choices such as street BBQ-ed tandoori chicken (check out the red colour!) as well as cholay batoore and others.




Of course it cannot be a festival without performances, and to their credit, the organizers had some set of dancers or performers every so often. And they were not just Indian - I saw Nepalese, Bengali amongst others. So at least in that aspect, it covered the whole South Asian flavour. 


I heard there was another festival in Mississauga, which is rapidly becoming another South Asian centre, along with Brampton. However with it comes to Gerrard, it is the OG, and many of us have fond memories of our early days in Canada coming down here to get a taste of South Asia in Toronto.


The weather was clear and sunny, and not too hot, which was perfect. You could walk around, see the whole set of bazaars and stalls, while getting tasty bites to eat.

As for parking, you have to park on the surrounding streets. On some of them you can only park on one side of the street (depending on the date) and there are also time restrictions (you can only park for an hour), so do pay attention. I wish there was a Green P location nearby that was easily accessible. However, it was a fun festival to attend.

Saturday, July 23, 2022

Taste of the Middle East, Toronto, 2022

The Taste of the Middle East is a festival that celebrates Arabic music, culture, food, arts and heritage. 

This year the festival was held downtown Toronto, at Nathan Phillips Square.


It was a brilliant sunny day. I visited on Friday, the first day of the festival. It runs Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Apparently there are bigger things planned on Sunday.


Along with the sponsor tents, there were lots of other tents of various merchants. Here is Huda, a religious organization, right next to the telecommunications giant Telus.


In the picture above, City Hall is to the background. Nathan Phillips Square has the advantage of having a huge Green P parking lot right underneath. I got in around 7 pm and got parking easily. It only cost $6.


Lots and lots of stalls, and lots and lots of people. It was great to see the huge diversity that makes Toronto one of the best cities in the world to live in. Everyone came to experience Arabic culture, not just Arabs (or Muslims).


People also have the misconception that Arabic culture is just limited to Muslims and Islam, which is not true. There's a lot of Christians in the Arab world. Some of the Arab world also have other cultures that are non Arab, for example Berbers.


As the evening went on, it became busier and busier, as more people started to drop by. The stage also started to have some shows and performances.


The one complaint I would have is that the food selection was not that big, and as expected from a festival - it was expensive. A pineapple juice drink was $13. A pastry was $8. Osmows shawarma platter was $13. I guess inflation hits everyone.

It's a great festival, particularly the musical big names at the end of the night. If you are in Toronto, it's definitely worth checking out, especially when parking is not a problem.

Tuesday, July 19, 2022

5 Ways How Early Islamic Empires Dealt With Inflation

TLDR version: Promote business, trade, production of goods and competition

Long version:

In a way, today's inflation is one of the signs of the Hour. 

" ... the increase of wealth to such an extent that even if one is given one hundred Dinars, he will not be satisfied ..." Said our Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), and it certainly applies today.

It is well known that Islam bans interest, and early Islamic empires (in fact, generally up to the Ottomans in the 14th century) faithfully followed this doctrine. There were no small kingdoms - the Ummayyad Empire was the largest empire in history at the time of its existence, stretching from Spain to the borders of India. With such complex trade routes, variety of products and constant warfare, inflation was always a possibility. How did these governments deal with inflation, when there is no interest rate to raise?

What causes inflation? Inflation is caused either by having surplus means of payments (including higher quantity of money in a society) or shortage of general supply. In other words, it deals with supply and demand, but in a general matter that touches all goods and services in economy.


This is how Islamic governments dealt with inflation:

1. No price fixing.

Inflation happened during the time of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). During the second year of Hijrah, prices rose and people wanted him to fix the prices. He refused [1].

2. Emphasize trade, and zero interest

“Whereas Allah has permitted trading and forbidden Riba (interet) ”(excerpt from; Surah Baqarah, 2-275).

Trading is real economic activity. In light of the above verse, Allah is emphasizing on trading or productivity, while Riba or interest has been made forbidden. Islamic governments encouraged trade, facilitated trade, and reduced barriers to entry for trade. As per Islamic philosophy, the use of ‘interest’, only helps rich or capitalists to multiply and control the wealth, which has specifically been referred in; Al-Quran 3-130.

No interest also meant far less credit available for investors for risky ventures that could result in big losses.

3. Preventing monopolies and hoarding

Monopolies, by their nature, lead to lack of competition through inhibiting innovation and quality, generally causing harm by driving prices upwards through restricting supply and leading to injustice. The Prophet Muhammad pbuh clearly criticised this [2]. He prohibited hoarding (one person buying up all the supplies to drive up demand).

4. Zakat and Awqaf

All Muslims (and their incorporated businesses in today's world) will have to pay zakat. Roughly this is 2.5% of all the savings (separate calculations are there for farm stock and cattle and gold/silver). Thus there was a natural incentive not to store money, but invest in business. 

Zakat being applied on the sale price acts to disincentivize artificially pushing prices up as a natural consequence, since increased prices of stock held would mean an increase in the amount of money required to pay the zakat.

Awqāf (Arabic for endowments, singular waqf) are a special kind of philanthropic deed in perpetuity, involving the donation of a sustainable asset that can produce a financial return or benefit, which then serves specific beneficiaries. The beauty of awqāf is its unrestricted nature vis-a-vis zakāh. Since awqāf utilise capital investment and then distribute the income/produce generated for social benefit, they can be set up to provide for the basic needs of people.

5. Government action on protectionism, and on supply and demand

While the Islamic government could not fix prices (and does not have any interest rate to manipulate), they would act both to protect the domestic economy as well as take action when there is a shortage of certain goods in the market. For example, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) created a separate market place for the nascent Muslim community in his very first year, enabling them to trade with each other without relying on other communities. He also prohibited a local city dweller from acting as an agent for a visitor, so cutting down the middleman.

Similarly, in the famine year, which was called Ramadha (ashes) year, when famine occurred only in Hijaz due to food shortage in that year and thus food prices increased, Caliph ‘Umar ibn Al-Khattab did not fix the prices of the foodstuffs. Rather he ordered supplies of foodstuffs from Egypt and ash-Sham to be sent to the Hijaz; thus prices dropped without the need for pricing.

It should also be noted that early Islamic empires (especially the Rashidun Caliphate) had a type of minimum wage (established under Caliph Umar where if the salary given to a slave was less than what he needed to live, the master would be punished for any crime committed by the slave to satisfy his hunger ), a type of guaranteed income (Caliph Abu Bakr would give essentials such as grain, blankets etc. to citizens), as well as a stipend for some notable members of the community.

In conclusion:

Under an Islamic economy, goods and services would be subject to natural market conditions, being driven by supply and demand in their purest sense, without interest-based credit distorting every level of the supply chain. Whilst Islam promotes a laissez-faire approach to market regulation, placing no prohibition on growth or price controls, it balances this with intervention by protecting the fundamentals required to live (such as staple foods and by extension utilities) under extreme circumstances to protect the consumer from being taken advantage of.

References:

1. 

Imam Ahmad narrated from Anas who said: “Prices increased at the time of the Messenger of Allah (pbuh), so they said, O Messenger of Allah, we wish would you price (fix the prices). He (pbuh) said: “Indeed Allah is the Creator, the holder (Qabidh), the Open-handed (Basit), the Provider (Raziq), the Pricer (who fixes prices); and I wish I will meet Allah and nobody demands (complains) of me for unjust act I did against him, neither in blood or property.”

https://systemofislam.com/index.php/14-the-prohibited-methods-of-increasing-ownership/14-6-price-fixing.html

Also Abu Dawud narrated from Abu Huraira, He said, “A man came and said, O Messenger of Allah, fix prices. He (pbuh) said: “Rather Allah reduces and increases.” 

2. 

“Whoever withholds food [in order to raise its price] has certainly erred!"

“Whoever strives to increase the cost [of products] for Muslims, Allah, the Exalted, will seat him in the centre of the Fire on the Day of Resurrection."

“What an evil person is the one who withholds! If Allah causes the prices to drop, he would be saddened, and if He causes them to climb, he would be excited."

https://iceurope.org/10-ways-to-manage-the-current-inflation-crisis-an-islamic-perspective/

Wednesday, July 06, 2022

Conservative Party of Canada - Great at Scoring Own Goals

 The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) is great at scoring own goals.

In the 2019 General Election, the Prime Minister of Canada was caught with pictures of him in blackface. He had just been found guilty of two ethics violations. He had interfered with a criminal prosecution of a Canadian company by the Attorney General. Under all circumstances this should have been a slam dunk for the CPC.

Instead, their leader lied about being an insurance salesman and an American, and could not give a straight answer, pun intended, on whether he would attend the Pride parade. 

Today: when you have such an inept government in Ottawa, winning an election should be easy. After all, the government is so inept that their solution to the passport chaos is buying chairs. Instead, the CPC shows its fantastic skill at scoring an own goal. 

Again.

The disqualification of Patrick Brown from the Conservative leadership race is unprecedented in Canadian politics. It is stunning and has made the front-page news everywhere. Any neutral Canadian will see this as a problem of the CPC itself.

Patrick Brown wasn't just any CPC candidate. He had signed 150,000 new members who had paid $15 to join the party (remember, Justin Trudeau had 100,000 when he won the Liberal leadership, and those weren't paid members either). Brown was one of the front runner in the race. Honestly, after the first ballot, it was going to be either him or Jean Charest that would have won the race.

By disqualifying him, the party establishment appear to have rigged the race to favour Pierre Poilievre. And to do so without giving any reasons? That's just bad politics, bad options - not to mention a hit job.

We can legitimately ask - What exact crime did Brown’s campaign do? What specific rule did they break? Were they given a proper hearing, as they allege they weren't? Brown's statement says they weren't given a full opportunity to defend themselves. And to complete the joke, the CPC isn't issuing any more comments.

For now.

Trudea 1. CPC -1.